In light of the evolving health situation in the United States, and in an effort to follow the recommendation of federal, state and local government to minimize large group meetings, all meetings and events will either be re-scheduled or conducted electronically. More information will be forthcoming. We are committed to providing value for your membership in these unique times and appreciate your flexibility. If there is anything we can do to support you, or if you have any questions, please let us know.

Criminal Conviction Screening Policies: Best Practices to Avoid Disparate Impact Liability

Fair Housing ,

NAA/NMHC White Paper on Resident Screening Policies
for Ex-Offenders Now Available

NAA/NMHC’s new white paper on HUD’s recently-issued guidance on the use of criminal histories in resident screening is now available for NAA members (member login required). The white paper, “Criminal Conviction Screening Policies: Best Practices to Avoid Disparate Impact Liability,”* was written by Mike Skojec, Partner at Ballard Spahr, LLP. The white paper reviews the HUD guidance, provides the historical and legal context and recommends best practices for apartment owners and operators.

HUD’s guidance seeks to end blanket exclusions of prospective residents based on criminal history in favor of a more individualized approach. While those with criminal histories are not a protected class under the Fair Housing Act, HUD has created the policy using disparate impact theory. Disparate impact allows fair housing complaints to proceed where actions have a discriminatory result on a protected class even if there was no intent to discriminate.

*Note: You must be logged into your NAA account to access the white paper.